Sunday, March 4, 2012

Sunday Sermon

Romans 4, Genesis 17 Lent 2B                                         Rev. Kristine Light Branaman
UniPlace Christian Church, Champaign IL                                               March 4, 2012
Treasure Eternal Promises

Treasure Eternal Promises. That has been the theme of our devotions for this second week of Lent, a theme addressed in both the Old Testament and New Testament scripture readings we’ve heard this morning.  Both Genesis and Romans refer to father Abraham, revered in Christianity, Judaism and Islam as a model for true faith.  Abraham, says the Apostle Paul, did not “waver concerning the promise of God, but he grew strong in his faith as he gave glory to God, 21 being fully convinced that God was able to do what he had promised.”

That is a mouthful.  To be “unwavering concerning the promise of God, growing strong in faith, giving glory to God, being fully convinced that God is able to do what God has promised.”  How many of us can make a claim like that?

We live in an age of change and uncertainty. People ask questions: about life’s purpose and meaning, about religion and values, about cultural diversity and preserving a sense of tradition. Soundbites broadcast daily on radio, TV and internet remind us of conflicting lifestyles and viewpoints, and inflammatory statements, like those of Limbaugh and Santorum which filled the news this week, are too often hurtful, inappropriate and intolerant.  It can certainly leave our faith in humankind wavering, can’t it?

Just after the First World War, when the entire western world was reeling from tremendous loss of life and enduring hardship, the English poet William Butler Yeats wrote a piece called “The Second Coming”. Not to be confused with Tim LaHaye’s “Left Behind” saga, the poem was a prophetic piece about approaching anarchy on the global stage.

In that poem Yeats uses the phrase; “things fall apart, the centre cannot hold”. Yeats writes about how all around him, certainties upon which people had built their lives were crumbling and falling to bits. He senses that the culture is disintegrating beyond repair and that it no longer has a stable center.

What he prophetically saw from within his own time we see clearly on the other side of it … this climate of confusion, anger, disappointment and grief allowed for the rise of the Third Reich.  Hitler’s madness was perfectly suited to a people desperate both for answers and somebody to blame after they had lost faith in previously stable institutions. Latching on greedily to a leader who would stoke the embers of fear and prejudice, a nation consented to unthinkable atrocities which erupted very shortly after into the flames of World War II.

But – enough of European History – what about this Abraham character, and why does a retired Pharisee like the Apostle Paul bring him up to young Christians in the imperial city of Rome at the dawn of a new era?

Not unlike the people of Yeats’ generation, the Romans Paul addresses were living in one of those times where stability was waning and seismic global shifts were detectable. Yes, the Roman Empire would hang on to power for several more centuries, but it would be battling to do so not only with swords and chariots, but also with the weapons of rhetoric, suspicion, and scapegoating.  People in these young churches throughout the empire, including those right under the nose of Ceasar in Rome, lived in fear of persecution, experienced prejudice and shunning, and suffered economically from their low social position.  Ostracized from previous systems like family networks and professional guilds, whether Jew or Greek, they too lived in a time where the center did not seem to be holding.

So how could they nurture faith?

The Apostle Paul offers up the example of Abraham who centered his life and his faith on a covenant God struck with him when he was 99 years old.  At a time in life when most of us assume our contributions to the world are behind us, Abraham (or as he was called before this covenant, Abram) believed he was chosen, uniquely called, to a purpose far greater than anything he had accomplished in his youth.

Abram shared an intimacy with God, in fact on multiple occasions he experienced visions or theophonies where he perceived God right there with him, directing his life.  When we get to the story relayed in Genesis 17 where the elderly couple are promised a child it isn’t a voice in Abram’s head telling him this, he experiences God in a very real and present way, and so does Sarai.  Abram knows that God isn’t calling them because no one else could possibly do the job. They are chosen for this, in spite of their age and social status, because God knows Abram is committed to this intimate relationship. 

Although they are old, although the promise of descendants and land seems impossible, they set out together in pursuit of the promise. It is this tenacity of faith in a climate of great risk that marks their story. Instead of pursuing security, sameness, and conserving what they have accumulated  , they strike out in pursuit of new promises from God.

What about us? In church circles, where we should know better, we often mark our life together by an atmosphere of caution rather than confidence, risk aversion rather than promise seeking. We look to worldly standards of success to gauge how we are doing rather than looking for that intimate presence of God to direct our path.  We ask the same questions in church that we ask at a business meeting at work: How big are our revenues? How many customers are we engaging? Which of our programs are most attractive? How can we cut costs?

In a book called “The Cynical Society”, Jeffrey Goldfarb comments that we believe “that if something is profitable it is true, real and good; if it is not, then it is without true meaning”.  The poet Wendell Berry in his poem Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front calls us to challenge that worldly thinking saying:

So, friends, every day do something
that won't compute. Love the Lord.
Love the world. Work for nothing.
Take all that you have and be poor.

       Further on in the same poem is that great line which speaks of looking toward promises that have nothing to do with benefits we reap for ourselves: Plant sequoias.

When Paul started new churches and then wrote to them in the following years with advice and counsel, he was clearly more concerned about their growth in righteousness through faith than their economic or numerical growth as a congregation. What Paul would tell us today is that even if we had the fanciest church in Champaign, the biggest membership, the greatest choir, the fastest growth in our membership roll, we could still be the least faithful church in Illinois.  None of those measures are sequoias. The measurements offered to us by the world to judge our health as God’s people are inadequate in reporting to us the state of our righteousness through faith.  And that is the planting which demands our attention.

It is significant that when Jesus set about changing the world He did so by nurturing the lives of a small group. As that small group nurtured other small groups, so the message spread. The crowds? Well the crowds were fickle, sensation-seeking and shallow. Just remember how often Jesus withdrew from them or sent them away in order to concentrate on nurturing His disciples.  And yet we are obsessed in our churches with a desire to draw a good crowd.

The story of Abraham and Sarah challenges us to consider how our faith community will nurture and promote the kind of intimacy with God that made a holy covenant possible for that ancient pair.

A meaningful life of faith requires active participation from each one of us. Real growth in our righteousness through faith will not come through trends tracked, fads followed or by throwing around the latest buzz words.  Those strategies do not hold up when the hard times come. If we build our lives on things that fall apart -- that rust and moth consume and thieves break in and steal -- it is impossible to maintain a consistent faith.

But if we can be more like Abraham and Sarah …

If we seek intimacy with and respond positively to the initiative of God.

If we believe that God still calls us for a meaningful purpose, regardless of age.

If we concentrate on the journey before us rather than the possessions of our past.

If we allow God to change us so much we even need new names …

Then, yes, our active response to God’s intrusion and disruption in our lives may ironically provide the stability to our faith --  

that gives us a center

that holds.


No comments: